3 ms·
If fishing was done on land and not miles off sea and underwater where the public can't see what's going on - I'm sure there would be much more care about how w
by helsinkiandrew 4y ago
If fishing was done on land and not miles off sea and underwater where the public can't see what's going on - I'm sure there would be much more care about how we fished and it wouldn't take a massive collapse in fish populations before something was done about it.
It seems no matter where in the world the same thing is happening in different ways and there seems to be a common response: it's not us - its foreign fisherman, big fishing companies, climate change, different types of fisherman, marine use etc.
- nervousvarun 4y agohttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corporation_(2003_film) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Corporation_(2003_film)
- metalliqaz 4y agoAfter watching that, may I suggest Parallax[1]. [1]https://youtu.be/42XcN52xEfU https://youtu.be/42XcN52xEfU
- noduerme 4y agoI just watched all 5 of these and was pretty amused. That being said, it's so tongue-in-cheek it kinda defeats the purpose of social commentary.
- notch898a 4y agoI worked on an Alaskan fishing vessel. They had a live aboard agent of the state making sure everything we did was kosher. I don't think the Russians in the Bering Sea had such restraints.
- mistrial9 4y agothe right response here is to prioritize the fish populations with the best available tech; a challenge common to all civilized people
- giantg2 4y ago"If fishing was done on land and not miles off sea and underwater where the public can't see what's going on - I'm sure there would be much more care about how we fished and it wouldn't take a massive collapse in fish populations before something was done about it." I think that's a but wishful. Just look at stuff like CAFOs. The majority of consumers don't give a damn as long as the price in the store is cheap enough. They're not thinking of where the stuff they're buying came from.
- ccooffee 4y agoI hadn't heard the term CAFO before. Here's a fact sheet from the Sierra Club about these "Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations": https://www.sierraclub.org/michigan/why-are-cafos-bad https://www.sierraclub.org/michigan/why-are-cafos-bad I've done a lot of highway driving around the US and CAFOs are probably the worst part of it. They are depressing to look at, and you can often smell them miles before you see them. Central California, all of Nebraska, and Northern Indiana are three places that stand out in my mind for having outrageous "density" of abhorrent-smelling places.
- alexpotato 4y agoI was born with no sense of smell and have worked in tech relate fields for the past 15 years. I used to joke that senior tech role at Waste Management would be an efficient pairing but the CAFO angle was unknown to me before this. PS HN being HN, I realize that even if I can't smell, my clothes etc might acquire an odor from being in smelly places.
- pvaldes 4y ago> If fishing was done on land I'm sure there would be much more care about how we fished viva Las Vegas
- alfalfasprout 4y agoThere's a correlated issue here-- housing (and other goods) have gotten so expensive with respect to real wages that most consumers don't really have much of a choice. Wealth inequality is a huge part of the reason consumers won't opt for the more eco-friendly or ethical options on the market.
- paulcole 4y agoThe public only cares about what is affecting them today and is right in front of their face. And often even then they don't care that much about those things. Generally speaking, people as individuals are simply not willing to change and will always point to someone else as being the problem. The only thing that has a chance at "solving" climate change and environmental collapse is individual action and individual change.
- sksndoffnd 4y agoThis is nonsense pushed by industrial lobbyists. The driving factors of climate change: * industrial * end of list Individuals changing their behavior will not do a single thing to solve, reduce, or delay the climate crisis. It’s a feel-good thing for individuals to do, yes, but it doesn’t help in the slightest.
- paulcole 4y agoIt's almost like industries are run by people who make decisions. Those people need to change their behavior as well.
- Loquebantur 4y agoYou are directly contradicting yourself in the last sentence? This nonsense-belief of "individual change" as a necessary precursor to societal adaptation of necessary policies is an absurdity most likely cooked up by industry spin-doctors. Of course, it is exactly the other way around. Abstract insight into a problem and its solution needs to be implemented into policy by the government. That is it's primary function.
- WeylandYutani 4y agoI don't eat seafood. Seems like a choice people could make (in fairness it is not an ideological decision for me I just can't stand the stuff).
- randomdata 4y ago> Abstract insight into a problem and its solution needs to be implemented into policy by the government. That's all well and good if you live in a dictatorship, but those of us under democracy are lead by the same individuals that who won't act. Only once they have decided to act and feel the need to clean up the outliers who continue to go against the grain will they use their governmental powers.
- erellsworth 4y agoI'm not so sure about that. The horrors of factory farming happen on land and while a lot of people criticize it, nothing much has been done about it since the 30s.
- Animatronio 4y agoSomething has been done about it, just not what one would hope. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ag-gag https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ag-gag
- erellsworth 4y agoYeah, that tracks. ALEC is behind a lot of reprehensible legislation.
- randomdata 4y agoFactory farming mostly takes place inside barns so, for all practical purposes, it is not really any more visible than fishing.
- Tiktaalik 4y agodon't forget fishermen blaming seals! lol