3 ms·
Nuclear (mostly) requires megacorp or nation state funding and most players are in an equilibrium for now. Supply chains for nuclear are feasible to detect and
by r3trohack3r 4y ago
Nuclear (mostly) requires megacorp or nation state funding and most players are in an equilibrium for now. Supply chains for nuclear are feasible to detect and control by existing players who want to keep the equilibrium.
When you look at markets with relatively low barriers to entry compared to nuclear with correspondingly high recreational and/or market value - humans have faired far worse at effective prohibitions.
Alcohol and other drugs. Illegal porn. Explosives. Sharing copyrighted material. Guns. Buying and selling humans. Cryptography. Etc.
Hop on any Silk Road replacement and you’ll find a nice list of failing prohibitions.
I do believe AI falls into the bucket of having a feasible black market. The supply chains are hard to detect and control. The cost is relatively low. And both the recreational and market value of it is high. It seems like something humans are going to do at this point regardless of whether it’s sanctioned or not.
- Retric 4y agoAhh, I see what you mean but none of that takes heavy R&D. Suggesting minimal barriers to entry seems like wishful thinking at this point. Sure, the average CS student should be able to write a pathfinding algorithm etc, but people who want to restrict types of AI research have a higher bar in mind.