4 ms·
It's not about location, it's about proximity of collaboration. WfH group wants to collaborate remotely, digitally. In-office group wants to collaborate local
by unglaublich 4y ago
It's not about location, it's about proximity of collaboration.
WfH group wants to collaborate remotely, digitally.
In-office group wants to collaborate locally, in person.
That is the difference.
WfH group takes this opportunity away from in-office group; like in-office group takes the opportunity away from WfH.
Can't have both. That's why the discussion is hard.
- SketchySeaBeast 4y agoThe problem is the genie is out of the bottle - unless in office is enforced and required 100% of the time it's still going to be Teams calls. Even before 2020 most of the meetings I were in, even if they were in person, had a teams call going at the same time because someone had to remote in.
- eddieroger 4y agoIt already was this in some places, but being annoyed by it was allowed and supported because it wasn't normal. Outlook has been adding calls since it was Lync. Any office with more than one location would have a phone bridge, but we blamed the tech when it failed because it was fun, and now we've learned it works more than well enough and we should rely on it.
- fundad 4y agoThe commute leaves no time for collaboration. Don’t talk to me while I’m at work, 3 hours of commuting leaves me with precious little productive time.