3 ms·
Higher rates mean lower property values - and lower property values mean the rent/mortgage trade off pushes rents lower. It’s instructive to look up how much th
by ianai 4y ago
Higher rates mean lower property values - and lower property values mean the rent/mortgage trade off pushes rents lower. It’s instructive to look up how much those SFHs rent for and compare it to local apartment complexes. There’s a huge premium.
(And it’s of note that dealing with renting a SFH is possibly a worse experience than renting from a complex. Large enough complexes have maintenance staff and professional management. Someone renting a SFH might well have just that unit to rent - amateur hour. Or they could be a corporation but because you’re just one unit in probably a more spread out population of properties the renter might well experience lowered services from the property management.)
I do agree the investment activity we’ve seen in simply hoarding up SFH properties for investment is deeply problematic. There are all sorts of ways to push the market back towards owner occupiers.
It’d also be nice if it was a standard thing for working people to be able to make it to public local government meetings. Those tend to be timed when working people are at work. That could help something’s, but there’s probably still be a lot of NIMBYism…
- ethbr0 4y agoIn the US at least, higher rates would seem to advantage owner-occupiers over SFH investors. It's harder for both to purchase, but investors are also heavily leveraged and fighting investment alternatives in a higher-rate environment.
- ianai 4y agoRight, the average American lives in a home for something like 7 years and probably decides to move because of things unrelated to interest rates (life events, mood). But the investors are living in the financial world. They’ve not traditionally swamped the SFH market which suggests it’s not a natural choice.