> Laughable attempt to control something very few can understand at the moment. It's a simplistic take on a misunderstood directive law project. The point of

> Laughable attempt to control something very few can understand at the moment. It's a simplistic take on a misunderstood directive law project. The point of that law is just to ban decisions made through black box algorithms, mostly because a black box algorithm (typically, some kind of "AI") cannot be proofed against discrimination and cannot explain why the decision was made, which is a regulatory requirement. That ChatGPT is generalistic enough to make these decisions the same way a specialist credit score AI would, doesn't really change anything to the EU plan or anything really. It would just be as illegal (and likely already deemed illegal in most EU countries under local laws). > nothing will stop somebody to transfer data from EU to US to get their data processed Well, EU law already forbids that. So you can do it of course, but it's outright illegal. Companies have already been fined significant fines for doing that, and most companies I know and work with are very aware of it, and take extreme care not to send data to or through the US. Of course, individuals can choose to use US services because this has nothing to do whatsoever with controlling people but controlling companies, which is exactly the opposition situation compared to China.