3 ms·
> It's a great marker for conspiracy theorists who can't handle something with random natural causes. Except it wasn't natural, and now everyone's come out to
by cbozeman 4y ago
> It's a great marker for conspiracy theorists who can't handle something with random natural causes.
Except it wasn't natural, and now everyone's come out to admit that the lab leak hypothesis is the most likely explanation.
- astrange 4y agoNo, what happened was an article last week had a headline saying one government report said that, but that's because the headline was lying to you and the article said the report was "low confidence". …And the majority of other government agencies still say it isn't, and all the ones with "medium confidence" or higher say it isn't. If being artificial is why it was bad, why are the later variants of it worse? Are they artificial too?