4 ms·

You should atleast check who you're replying to before you throw your toys out of the cot.

by philliphaydon 4y ago

FooBarWidget 4y ago
Ah you're right, I apologize on that point.
- emptysongglass 4y ago
  And in any case you completely side-stepped addressing my point that any violence that results from Western hysteria (as you put it) lies squarely at the feet of China. China alone will be responsible for the deaths that result from a forcible invasion of Taiwan. China will share bloodied hands with Russia if they sell arms to Russia to advance its crusade of terror.
  - FooBarWidget 4y ago
    So you are endorsing current violence against Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese citizen in the United States, before China has actually performed any invasions?!?
  - FooBarWidget 4y ago
    Actually I was being too charitable in my other reply. "Olaf Scholz suggested that Germany received bilateral assurances from China that it won't supply Russia with weapons for its war against Ukraine. EU Commission President von der Leyen said she had seen "no evidence" of Chinese considerations to send arms." https://www.politico.eu/article/china-ukraine-war-russia-weapon-deliveries-scholz-putin-zelenskyy-xi-jinping/ https://www.politico.eu/article/china-ukraine-war-russia-wea... So you're essentially saying that it's okay to attack Asians in the west even though China has not actually supplied weapons to Russia!?!?!
    - philliphaydon 4y ago
      [flagged]
      - FooBarWidget 4y ago
        What's the point of raising all these things? I can dispute those claims but at this point it doesn't matter one bit whether those claims are actually true or not. How does flooding the media with such claims improve human rights in China? They achieve no positive effects for anyone in China: sanctions and war only hurt people. They are also spectacularly effective at making the lives of Asians in the west miserable. Yet you keep myopically focusing on these claims, heedless of the actual harm they do to innocent people, just so that you can feel like you're being virtuous for raising these claims. You are not actually supporting human rights, you are abusing the very concept to feel good about yourself.
        philliphaydon 4y ago
        See what I mean, you care more about saving face than the people suffering. "none of its true, I can dispute it, its you who is wrong" Look, I don't know why you keep replying to me. No one buys your propaganda and conspiracy theories and whataboutism. You can keep getting upset all you want but it doesn't change the fact you're doing nothing more than attempting to protect the CCP.
        FooBarWidget 4y ago
        [flagged]
        dang 4y ago
        You've also broken the site guidelines in this thread and continued to do exactly what we asked you not do to in the past. I'm not going to ban your account right now because (a) I don't think you broke the guidelines quite as badly as the other account did in this thread (though I haven't read it closely), (b) I understand what it's like to be representing a minority view, and (c) we haven't given you nearly as many past warnings. But you're seriously breaking the HN guidelines here and we've warned you before. If you keep this up, we're going to end up having to ban you as well. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Also, when I look through your comments, it seems that you've been using HN primarily for political and ideological battle. That's another line at which we ban accounts, because that's absolutely not the intended use of this site. If your primary interest is to argue about politics and national/ethnic/ideological struggles, HN is not the site you're looking for. Please don't keep doing this. Past explanations are here, in case they're helpful: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comment&storyText=false&prefix=false&page=0&query=primarily%20test%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....

You should atleast check who you're replying to before you throw your toys out of the cot.

FooBarWidget 4y ago

Ah you're right, I apologize on that point.

emptysongglass 4y ago
And in any case you completely side-stepped addressing my point that any violence that results from Western hysteria (as you put it) lies squarely at the feet of China. China alone will be responsible for the deaths that result from a forcible invasion of Taiwan. China will share bloodied hands with Russia if they sell arms to Russia to advance its crusade of terror.
- FooBarWidget 4y ago
  So you are endorsing current violence against Chinese, Korean, Japanese and Vietnamese citizen in the United States, before China has actually performed any invasions?!?
- FooBarWidget 4y ago
  Actually I was being too charitable in my other reply. "Olaf Scholz suggested that Germany received bilateral assurances from China that it won't supply Russia with weapons for its war against Ukraine. EU Commission President von der Leyen said she had seen "no evidence" of Chinese considerations to send arms." https://www.politico.eu/article/china-ukraine-war-russia-weapon-deliveries-scholz-putin-zelenskyy-xi-jinping/ https://www.politico.eu/article/china-ukraine-war-russia-wea... So you're essentially saying that it's okay to attack Asians in the west even though China has not actually supplied weapons to Russia!?!?!
  - philliphaydon 4y ago
    [flagged]
    - FooBarWidget 4y ago
      What's the point of raising all these things? I can dispute those claims but at this point it doesn't matter one bit whether those claims are actually true or not. How does flooding the media with such claims improve human rights in China? They achieve no positive effects for anyone in China: sanctions and war only hurt people. They are also spectacularly effective at making the lives of Asians in the west miserable. Yet you keep myopically focusing on these claims, heedless of the actual harm they do to innocent people, just so that you can feel like you're being virtuous for raising these claims. You are not actually supporting human rights, you are abusing the very concept to feel good about yourself.
      - philliphaydon 4y ago
        See what I mean, you care more about saving face than the people suffering. "none of its true, I can dispute it, its you who is wrong" Look, I don't know why you keep replying to me. No one buys your propaganda and conspiracy theories and whataboutism. You can keep getting upset all you want but it doesn't change the fact you're doing nothing more than attempting to protect the CCP.
        FooBarWidget 4y ago
        [flagged]
        dang 4y ago
        You've also broken the site guidelines in this thread and continued to do exactly what we asked you not do to in the past. I'm not going to ban your account right now because (a) I don't think you broke the guidelines quite as badly as the other account did in this thread (though I haven't read it closely), (b) I understand what it's like to be representing a minority view, and (c) we haven't given you nearly as many past warnings. But you're seriously breaking the HN guidelines here and we've warned you before. If you keep this up, we're going to end up having to ban you as well. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html Also, when I look through your comments, it seems that you've been using HN primarily for political and ideological battle. That's another line at which we ban accounts, because that's absolutely not the intended use of this site. If your primary interest is to argue about politics and national/ethnic/ideological struggles, HN is not the site you're looking for. Please don't keep doing this. Past explanations are here, in case they're helpful: https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comment&storyText=false&prefix=false&page=0&query=primarily%20test%20by:dang https://hn.algolia.com/?sort=byDate&dateRange=all&type=comme....