4 ms·
The fact that nearly every test has a time limit isn't proof that time limits are useful. Furthermore the majority of tests taken in school are completely forgo
by quacked 4y ago
The fact that nearly every test has a time limit isn't proof that time limits are useful. Furthermore the majority of tests taken in school are completely forgotten even a year later, meaning that students didn't "know" the information in the first place, they were just able to regurgitate it for a useless exercise in stress and make-work.
- naasking 4y agoTests are useful as spaced repetition, and spaced repetition is good for remembering. That students may not remember a specific test a year later doesn't seem relevant. Time limits are necessary because everything is time limited, even when applying this knowledge in a job, and if you're struggling to finish in time, then that indicates areas that need work.
- bawolff 4y agoMost (tech) jobs put a premium on being right over being fast. Nobody cares if you get the wrong answer quickly. Person who takes longer but gets a better answer will usually do better in their career.
- naasking 4y agoLearning you're getting the wrong answer quickly is a big part of why we test. Taking longer can help your career, but there's a limit. Test times were always very generous for people ahead of the curve, short for people below, and just about right for everyone else, because that's how they're designed.
- bawolff 4y agoMost tests i've taken are not structured that way. Most of the time you need a multipart question to get significant benefit of realizing you are wrong fast. In a world of multiple choice tests, that is pretty rare. Ancedotal, but when i was in school i remember people top of the class were often last to finish their test (i guess because they double checked things more).
- ryan93 4y agoAn aside. I think people care about speed. An MIT degree finished in four years is more impressive than one finished in 8