3 ms·
I am playing with it right now. Not for results and discussions, but it could be valuable for the introduction fluff, which is very tedious to write, and the me
by kergonath 4y ago
I am playing with it right now. Not for results and discussions, but it could be valuable for the introduction fluff, which is very tedious to write, and the methods and techniques, which is very repetitive and for which I sometimes struggle to avoid self-plagiarism and copying and pasting from previous articles.
- sdenton4 4y agoUgh, I tend to think of self plagiarism in methods and techniques sections as a feature, not a bug... No change means no change, after all; so long as the other paper is cited, it's clearer that the methodology is consistent.