5 ms·
>our classifier correctly identifies 26% of AI-written text (true positives) as “likely AI-written,” while incorrectly labeling human-written text as AI-written
by sebzim4500 4y ago
>our classifier correctly identifies 26% of AI-written text (true positives) as “likely AI-written,” while incorrectly labeling human-written text as AI-written 9% of the time (false positives)
That is... not impressive. I'm honestly surprised that OpenAI was willing to release the tool in this state, it's probably the least reponsible thing they have done since calling themselves "OpenAI". Some kids are going to get expelled for no reason.
- corobo 4y agoIf schools start using it, solely it, for plagiarism/cheat detection then I'm right there behind you in the protest. I'd be ok with it being a first line thing that causes a more fine tuned manual check and maybe a manual pop quiz on what the person 'wrote', though. Manual being the key word after AI does its bit.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]