4 ms·

Nope, I very much doubt it. http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/pseudonyms-on-google-plus-wrong http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/pseudonyms-on-google-pl..

• obtu 15y ago
  http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/pseudonyms-on-google-plus-wrong/983 http://www.zdnet.com/blog/violetblue/pseudonyms-on-google-pl... (fixing the link)
• mvgoogler 15y ago
  The linked article seems to mis-understand the new policy. Please read Yonatan's comments on the OP, or refer to the conversation that is happening on Yonatan's own post (https://plus.google.com/u/0/103389452828130864950/posts/YJbzDptWGQt https://plus.google.com/u/0/103389452828130864950/posts/YJbz...). I have a lot of respect for Violet Blue, but I'd say that Yonatan is much more of an authority on the new policy than Violet. You didn't include in your post any context about the rejection - when you changed you name, what you tried to change it to, why you think it meets the need policy, etc. If you think you have a legitimate false positive, I can assure that Yonatan would be very interested in hearing the details and I would be willing to bet that if you asked a question on his post you would get a response.