> By using the terminology "break the law", you seem to be intentionally disregarding the fact they have not been convicted of anything, and the assertions they

> By using the terminology "break the law", you seem to be intentionally disregarding the fact they have not been convicted of anything, and the assertions they even did anything illegal are questionable at best given they complied with DCMA takedown notices. Substitute "be accused of breaking the law" for "break the law". Yes, the police and prosecutors have that kind of discretion. And no, grand juries are not a significant impediment. As the saying goes, a grand jury will indict a ham sandwich.