4 ms·
I have almost completely eliminated single-use plastics from my life to the point that my only non-recyclable waste output is a single half-full 20-gallon bag s
by rocket_surgeron 4y ago
I have almost completely eliminated single-use plastics from my life to the point that my only non-recyclable waste output is a single half-full 20-gallon bag set out for collection approximately every three weeks.
The very few remaining items are typically cleaning supplies such as bleach and hazardous cleaning agents but for safety and hygiene purposes I do not consider those a high priority for finding non-plastic alternatives.
Please note that I do not include the several-microns-thick coating of plastic that coats the insides of some cardboard boxes and aluminum cans as "plastic output" due to its total annual weight (in my case) being less than that of a single bottle of shampoo.
For shaving I use a safety razor, whose blades come in cardboard. For shaving cream I use a puck that comes in cardboard packaging. My toothpaste comes in compressed pellets and all of my soap, even shampoo, comes in bar form. There are currently no plastic single-use items in my bathroom. Even my toilet paper is purchased in bulk, 80 rolls at a time, and comes in a large cardboard box with each roll packaged in paper. It is a recognizable brand's "Industrial" product line.
Rather than paying for water most of my cleaning products are purchased in powder form, usually under a recognizable brand's "Industrial" product line, in bulk. This means that yes, I do buy a 5-gallon bucket of laundry detergent but in over a year after I have finally used it all I have a reusable 5-gallon bucket that does not go into the waste stream. You can also buy items like that in cardboard boxes lined with a plastic liner but even then the volume of plastic is, after many years, less than that of a single plastic laundry detergent container which only lasts months.
Even cleaning products that, again for health and safety reasons, come in plastic containers I buy them in bulk, dispensing them into reusable (and much higher quality) applicators. This means that the (realistically) unavoidable use of plastics is minimized. The amount of plastic used in a single 128-ounce bulk "industrial" cleaning bottle is less than that used in 4 32-ounce (typical sized) bottles and the reusable (again, "industrial") spray bottles I use to apply the product last for years if not decades.
For food items I typically do not buy anything that comes in plastic with the main exception being sliced bread, but again that volume of plastic is so low it is almost irrelevant. When I realized that I was throwing away ~30 plastic yogurt containers per month I started making yogurt myself in an instant pot and storing the yogurt in glass jars. Doing so requires almost no effort-- the instant pot does it for you. I've been doing this since 2011 with the same jars, which will probably last another 100 years, so I have not thrown away over 4,000 yogurt containers.
In your example, the rubber bands and stickers are irrelevant. Years, if not decades, of rubber (assuming you mean synthetic rubber, natural rubber is fine and will biodegrade) bands and stickers add up to a single bottle of dish soap's worth of plastic.
Plastic is a wonderful material but it is immoral, to me, to use it without foresight of its impact and costs.
It requires effort, but is not "hard". Effort does not equal "hard".
My anti-plastic crusade started because I live on the Chesapeake Bay and became involved in Bay cleanup initiatives about a decade ago. I'd say 9 out of every 10 items I recovered were plastic items, some from as far away as New York State, having floated for hundreds of miles down the Susquehanna and Delaware Rivers.