> Would it be good if it was computed by hand on paper instead of through AI? Yes, as long as that is based on clear reasons why the decision was reached. (Unl

> Would it be good if it was computed by hand on paper instead of through AI? Yes, as long as that is based on clear reasons why the decision was reached. (Unless this was a quip meant to mean "matrix muls with pen and paper are not AI!", personally I'd say they are, the same way bubble sort is bubble sort on paper and in code.) [1] on the topic "why": > For example, it is often not possible to find out why an AI system has made a decision or prediction and taken a particular action. As far as I know, there are some rules around that (especially social scoring), but the regulation was/is targeted to lay out rules minimizing the applications in similar risky areas that do not have those same rules yet. [1] https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory-framework-ai https://digital-strategy.ec.europa.eu/en/policies/regulatory...