> Homeless people don't have the funds to relocate. It's a trivial problem to solve given current government programs for food stamps, etc. Why is it even a li

> Homeless people don't have the funds to relocate. It's a trivial problem to solve given current government programs for food stamps, etc. Why is it even a limitation to begin with. If getting people housed is the objective, does it matter that much if it's in a different city? I understand if it's across the country, but there are plenty of cheap cities around SF, for example, yet SF is still attracting a lot of people that apparently cannot afford to live there.