I agree about the false positives. What I'm saying is that false negatives are more costly at a startup because you have less of a good candidate pipeline. Pa

I agree about the false positives. What I'm saying is that false negatives are more costly at a startup because you have less of a good candidate pipeline. Passing up on good candidates extends your hiring process and may even push people to hire someone you otherwise wouldn't have later because you need engineers. Google doesn't care because they will have 100 more candidates the next day.