4 ms·
I don't buy that this is accidental. When you write software, you test it on every platform you choose to support. If it doesn't work on a supported platform,
by calibas 4y ago
I don't buy that this is accidental.
When you write software, you test it on every platform you choose to support. If it doesn't work on a supported platform, then you take the time to fix it before release.
It's not an "accident" when the software doesn't work on a platform you didn't bother to test on. That platform is being neglected by policy, not because of some "accident" in the code.
- danpalmer 4y ago> When you write software, you test it on every platform you choose to support. This depends on your definition of "support". It's very likely that Microsoft do not claim to support (as in, put customer support resources behind) Firefox Nightly, this would be reasonable as it's provided for development utility, not daily use. However, I do somewhat disagree that you test it on every platform. If Teams is built as a website, do we expect them to test every feature of every release on every browser? Probably not, we expect that they do reasonable testing across a representative range of browsers, maybe focused on major features.
- calibas 4y ago> If Teams is built as a website, do we expect them to test every feature of every release on every browser? If they've got good unit tests, they may test every feature of every Teams release and I assume they test on all the browsers/versions that represent the vast majority of the market. They don't bother supporting FF Nightly because it's not important to them, not because of some "accident" in the code.
- kredd 4y agoYou guys test against non-stable versions of every browser before release?
- calibas 4y agoNope, and that's a matter of policy. I certainly wouldn't argue it's an "accident" that a site I create doesn't work properly in FF Nightly.