4 ms·
This is a fallacy imo. The less mundane, mindnumbing and highly automated jobs we have, the better. There is a reason why for example living human beings do no
by wetpaws 4y ago
This is a fallacy imo. The less mundane, mindnumbing and highly automated jobs we have, the better.
There is a reason why for example living human beings do not manually switch phone lines anymore when you make a phone call - you could rationalize it as much as you can, but frankly humans we born for better stuff.
- bogomipz 4y agoIf you are going to state something is fallacy then you might want to substantiate the fallacy. Instead all you provide is your opinion that the elimination of a class of jobs is for "the better." What I have stated is that entry level positions are a means of advancement in retail environments. This based on empirical fact. >"There is a reason why for example living human beings do not manually switch phone lines anymore when you make a phone call" No, the reason "human beings do not manually switch phone lines anymore" is because the growth of subscriber lines exceeded the capacity for manual switching in Central Offices. It had nothing to do with nature of the job.