> First we should stop repeating that the private education system is better than the public education system. I look to the private sector because I wondering

> First we should stop repeating that the private education system is better than the public education system. I look to the private sector because I wondering if perhaps something could be done easier in it rather than in the public ed sector. Education in the US runs on federalism so every state does things differently trying to innovate is hard because it's a bureaucracy that isn't wholly consistent even within states. > For what a good education system looks like, one should look at the Scandinavian countries, more specifically Finland Comparing success in Finland or other Scandinavian countries isn't fair, those countries have populations not even larger than some of the cities here in the U.S. Ranking U.S states by population Finland wouldn't even break top 20. What works for them doesn't directly translate to working for us. > If the system does not recruit the best and then not provide them with the prestige in the society then the system erodes over time. But I do strongly agree with getting the best teachers possible by making the pool more competitive and not somewhere those who couldn't do anything more with their life go. You'd solve this also by just paying teachers more obviously because you'd start competing with professions with people who have a greater potential to be great teachers. Paying teachers more though is obviously really hard in p.ed. because it be Tax payers money and people have drastically different views on where there money should be going and if any should be directed toward teachers. I'm not trying to say that the big solution is completely move Education into the private sector I'm just saying that possibly the most optimal solution doesn't fully exist in public ed.