4 ms·
A picture of the Matterhorn doesn't seem like a lie to me? I wouldn't normally expect that to be an indication that something was made in the country containing
by jefftk 4y ago
A picture of the Matterhorn doesn't seem like a lie to me? I wouldn't normally expect that to be an indication that something was made in the country containing that peak.
There's also a thing where many regional names are used as descriptions of foods: I don't expect Neapolitan ice cream to be made in Naples, I just expect the Strawberry/Chocolate/Vanilla pattern. In general I think this tends to be a lot more controversial in Europe, with specific DPO categorizations, then in the US, where the standard is a lot more literal (ex: Americans interpret "Champagne" to be a claim about the style, while Europeans interpret it to additionally include where the product was made).
- _fat_santa 4y agoYeah I think these "swiss" rules are more applicable to higher end things like Watches, the term "swiss made" would carry zero weight if those rules were not applied because every watch maker would find a way to stick that in there. But with this, I personally never saw the swiss connection and always found the branding to stand on it's own, and the mountain was never a big part of their branding anyways, it was always the shape of the box.
- ronaldj 4y agoGrowing up Subaru had these Outback commercials with a guy that had an Australian accent. The accent plus the Outback name made me believe for my entire childhood that Subaru were Australian cars.
- dghlsakjg 4y agoHaha. I had the exact same misconception!
- gumby 4y agoAt least the Pleiades are visible from the Australia for part of the year. So your misconception could have been worse. Toyota sells a range of trucks in the USA named using North American geographical names. Perhaps it’s a Japanese thing?
- kennywinker 4y ago> I wouldn't normally expect that to be an indication that something was made in the country containing that peak. Really? Because it genuinely seems like a claim about where it's from to me. IN this case are you sure you're not just so used to being lied to that you expect the lie? That said, your point about Neapolitan makes sense to me. Like - I know full well the "New york pizza" place near me is not shipping pizzas from new york, it's meaning "new york style". Not sure how to distinguish between geographic style references, which I have no problem with, and false implications about a product's origin. But it'd be nice if we could.
- a2800276 4y ago> I wouldn't normally expect that to be an indication that something was made in the country containing that peak. You're probably American (where presumably these laws won't be applicable anyway, though I have no idea concerning US-Swiss Trade agreements). Europeans have been conditioned at least to some degree to associate chocolate with cows running around pristine alpine pastures to give the milk that makes Swiss chocolate so unique. You're correct that European geographic origin tends to be more of an issue in Europe than the US. Reason being: European law does not automatically apply in the US. Otoh, to call something "Tennessee Whiskey" it must have seen Tennessee at least briefly. I have to contradict your claim that the American interpretation is more "literal" though. "Champagne" is _literally_ the name of a region in France were a type of sparkling wine was invented.
- jefftk 4y ago> I have to contradict your claim that the American interpretation is more "literal" though. Maybe not the best phrasing, sorry! But I do think there's a difference here. When Americans buy "Colby" cheese we don't expect it to be from Colby WI, and we don't expect "Buffalo sauce" to be from Buffalo NY. Those regional names have become part of the name of the food. On the other hand, in "Tennessee Whiskey", "Wisconsin Cheddar", or "New Jersey Blueberries" the location is mostly just telling you where it was produced. No one is misled by "Colby cheese" from California, but they would be misled by "New Jersey Blueberries" from Massachusetts.
- a2800276 4y agoSeems a bit arbitrary :) Which it is in Europe as well, e g. the essence of Wiener Schnitzel is not that it's from Vienna, but that it's made from veal. Same preparation using pork may only be sold as Vienna-style. Come to think of it, Wiener sausages don't have to come from Vienna either...
- jefftk 4y agoOk, maybe it's not actually that different in the normal case!
- thiht 4y ago> Americans interpret "Champagne" to be a claim about the style, while Europeans interpret it to additionally include where the product was made This is because the style has a specific name. A Champagne is: - a sparkling wine - made using the « méthode traditionnelle champenoise » (literally « traditional method from the Champagne region ») - from the Champagne region - + a few other technicalities We have a lot of sparkling wines (« mousseux ») made with the méthode traditionnelle and they can be marked as such, but they’re not champagne. And they do taste different from champagne (and I personally prefer most méthode traditionnelle other than champagne so good for me, less expensive). For products like wine or cheese, the soil has a huge impact on the final taste, that’s why it’s so important to differentiate between the type of product and its origin.
- nicolas_t 4y agoAs someone who enjoys Crémant d'Alsace a lot more than Champagne, I'm so glad for the price difference :) Now if only I could find some in Hong Kong.