14 ms·
> It's not stupid. It's bold and almost risk-free. It's stupid and risky for either the US or China to escalate a war that threatens to become a global conflic
by JasonFruit 4y ago
> It's not stupid. It's bold and almost risk-free.
It's stupid and risky for either the US or China to escalate a war that threatens to become a global conflict between nuclear powers. I wish saner heads urging restraint would prevail.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- matheusmoreira 4y agoAs opposed to what, just allowing the US to dominate you? Some people would rather destroy this planet than be subjugated by a foreign power. I don't blame them. At least they have the strength necessary to present such a credible threat. I wish my country did.
- papito 4y agoSo, China and Russia can just point on a map and say "I want that, and I have nukes, so, you know, WWIII". If we are going to play this game, let's have it all out now, because that's no way to live. We all agreed a long time ago that this is not what nukes are for, and if someone wants to lay new rules, they should be ready for what's coming.
- matheusmoreira 4y agoOf course they can. The only real defense against this is for everyone to have nukes. The only question now is whether NATO is going to escalate to global thermonuclear war over some foreign country. Seriously doubt they care that much.