Another case of moving the goal posts. It used to be thought that only humans could play chess, as chess playing was seen as a mark of human intelligence, then

Another case of moving the goal posts. It used to be thought that only humans could play chess, as chess playing was seen as a mark of human intelligence, then when computers could play chess it was thought only humans could play chess well, and when computers could play chess well it was argued that computers couldn't beat the best of human chess players, so humans were ahead. But then computers started to beat the best hummer chess players. So the sights were next set on Go, which went through the same cycle, but much faster until computers could outplay the best human Go players. The evolution of AI is littered with such hurdles that computers overcame time and time again, but the goal posts keep moving. We should note that some humans can't do the things you ask for either... or not well, and if they can they don't always do so (most people speak in cliches, for instance, so could be said to be "just reshuffling words"), and, anyway, computers are quite capable of generating randomness, which is definitely "new" in some sense.