> This article is pure conservative BS Just based on how the entire article is structured, and the way it links in supporting evidence that normal people don't

> This article is pure conservative BS Just based on how the entire article is structured, and the way it links in supporting evidence that normal people don't do, its like a delusional rant almost, but there's something off, honestly, the inconsistency in certain areas makes it looks like a number of articles that were generated by chat-GPT. Anyone else getting that vibe? Aside from that, it completely ignores the division of labor, and AI isn't being developed to augment production, its being developed to replace human's as the source of productive effort. For the communist bashing it does about universal basic income, its positively influencing socialist topics, cherry picking, and quite ironic. The benefits we get from being the primary form of production are growth from challenges, professional experience, money, food, the means to support children, etc. There's a lot of good reasons why thinking machines are generally outlawed/banned on pain of death in realistic scifi literature. Overpopulation isn't a problem anyone wants to touch. What use is humanity if the environment becomes disadvantaged to human intellect, and there are too many mouths to feed for the resources available. There are always limits to growth. Most benefits we enjoy today have only been possible through the division of labor.