Ok the article was a guest post on the blog by a guy named Aaron Carr which I take is this guy https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaroncarrny/ https://www.linkedin.co

Ok the article was a guest post on the blog by a guy named Aaron Carr which I take is this guy https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaroncarrny/ https://www.linkedin.com/in/aaroncarrny/ who seems to be some sort of reasonable expert on homelessness, the article has a lot of sections with stuff like this >Furthermore, if mental health were the main driver of homelessness, places with the most mental illness would have the most homelessness. However, the data shows the exact opposite: followed by a scatterplot graph Rate of Serious Mental Illness Versus PIT Count (per capita) with links to the source of the graph for example this https://www.sightline.org/2022/03/16/homelessness-is-a-housing-problem/ https://www.sightline.org/2022/03/16/homelessness-is-a-housi... So, what is your actual problem with 'this dude'? Or the 'content' that has been 'created'? on edit: I could totally understand (without necessarily agreeing) if your post was "this guy looks like someone trying to increase funding for their organization by cherry-picking stats to support a tenuous case"