> Why assume that if humans can create a general intelligence, they can also dictate what that general intelligence will desire? People do the first thing all

> Why assume that if humans can create a general intelligence, they can also dictate what that general intelligence will desire? People do the first thing all the time at slightly above replacement rate. (This may be a bit easy to forget in communities particularly interested in the artificial kind!) Success at the second thing varies, but on the whole biases pretty heavily successful.