2 ms·
>...but you are still able to make out the meaning without all that much difficulty and without much of a chance of misinterpretation, i.e. these language are q
by thfuran 4y ago
>...but you are still able to make out the meaning without all that much difficulty and without much of a chance of misinterpretation, i.e. these language are quite robust in the face of transmission errors
Well, sometimes. There are plenty of single-character errors in English that could change meaning though: Presence of absence of a comma, asymptomatic vs symptomatic, bat vs bet, etc.
- pclmulqdq 4y agoLook no further than the US constitution, particularly its second amendment, to see how much a single punctuation mark can matter. Also sentences like: "the Google party featured two strippers, Larry and Sergei." Are the founders of Google the two aforementioned strippers or VIP guests?
- naniwaduni 4y agoNeither of those examples really hinge on the punctuation. The latter is a constructed absurdity based on violating information structure soft constraints (i.e. the way it's phrased is deliberately unhelpful).
- pclmulqdq 4y agoFor more serious examples: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serial_comma The one I chose was a tongue-in-cheek absurdity. There are other cases where there actually is ambiguity.
- naniwaduni 4y agoNominally, sure. In practice, almost all instances are resolved by context, modulo motivated reasoning.