That was roughly my take reading the discussion yesterday. It's possible there is something that's been missed in the criticism, but I haven't seen any compelli

That was roughly my take reading the discussion yesterday. It's possible there is something that's been missed in the criticism, but I haven't seen any compelling evidence that this is actually decoding what we visualize (in the sense of the actual visual) and so the SD angle is just a gag. Problem is, people see the article, don't understand what it means, and start parroting it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35023642 https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35023642