> If this were truly a free market, then when those Ohio residents had their property rights imposed upon, they'd be able to recover the full costs of those imp

> If this were truly a free market, then when those Ohio residents had their property rights imposed upon, they'd be able to recover the full costs of those impositions through the legal system. “You’re free to poison me, but you’ll have to pay for it” doesn’t sound like a particularly well functioning system either. I think I would rather try to work out a political and regulatory system that resists capture.