4 ms·
This was the thing that totally blew me away when I was introduced to GPT a couple of months ago. It’s “programmed” in natural language. And when you think ab
by doctor_eval 4y ago
This was the thing that totally blew me away when I was introduced to GPT a couple of months ago.
It’s “programmed” in natural language.
And when you think about it, it’s obvious: we don’t really know how it works, so how else could we program it?
That said, I don’t understand why the outputs of these systems aren’t “read” by a second GPT instance that is tasked with determining if the output is OK.
- Animats 4y agoIt does that, right? You get a response, generated word by word, and then the censorship classifier reads it and makes the entire response disappear.
- doctor_eval 4y agoYeah - it seems to, sometimes, but considering all these prompt leaks, it doesn’t seem terribly good. Like it seems obvious that Sydney could detect its own prompts, but it doesn’t. I mean you could do that with grep. So what’s with that?