Good bit of logic and satire and sort of proof by contradiction. I think (not sure) the above point is that if you could show it's malevolent, big implications

Good bit of logic and satire and sort of proof by contradiction. I think (not sure) the above point is that if you could show it's malevolent, big implications follow. Probably user j-pg thinks it's not and def not an example of agi. Or maybe his point was chatgpt is seen through an inappropriate prism leading to silly places