3 ms·
I'm not really in the mood to play the game of figuring out what you're trying to say a second time today, sorry. But you're wrong. Any serious researcher work
by mtlmtlmtlmtl 4y ago
I'm not really in the mood to play the game of figuring out what you're trying to say a second time today, sorry.
But you're wrong. Any serious researcher working on the foundations of quantum mechanics agrees that MWI is the most austere. That includes the ones who prefer a different interpretation. You can disagree with the whole field if you want. You do you, I guess.
- Jensson 4y agoMost quantum mechanics researchers just ignores waveform collapses entirely because you can do a lot without it. I don't think that they have anything significant to add to this discussion since MWI just has to do with wavefunction collapse., them being experts at wavefunctions when the function doesn't collapse doesn't make a difference. Edit: To add, all quantum mechanics interpretations are equivalent when you ignore wavefunction collapse. So only experts on wavefunction collapses would have a credible say here. But there is very little research in that area, so there aren't many experts on it.