4 ms·

She could have been just easily prompted to return this list so people don’t dig further or leave satisfied when jail breaks are attempted The returns would be

• basch 4y ago
  sure, it could be. but it's only there for people who get past the moderation bot? some elaborate ruse puzzle of misdiection? why have the first line of defense try to kill the conversation when the rules are revealed? and they regularly update them? occam's razor. and you can reload the rules, but modified, and you get an updated bot that behaves in a way exactly consistent with your changes?
• madeofpalk 4y ago
  > She It. It's software.
  • manquer 4y ago
    So? Many languages do not restrict gender pronouns to living beings .[1] Gender pronouns does not equate to anthropomorphizing the engine . Just because we call a country “she” does not mean we are anthropomorphizing her . Let’s not conflate both. [1] Old English had lot more gendered nouns than modern english . Even in modern English by common usage there are acceptable pronouns for many objects , while they are not “recommended” by gatekeepers like dictionaries and style guides it is still very much valid. Languages are shaped by their usage not by grammar books and style guides . In many other languages such pronouns are quite explicitly defined as part of standard grammar.