Huh, yeah. Looking at the economics, super soldiers are nearly pure loss. Nearly nothing they could ever do would be net positive on the balance sheet. They're

Huh, yeah. Looking at the economics, super soldiers are nearly pure loss. Nearly nothing they could ever do would be net positive on the balance sheet. They're even more lossy than just draftees, what with all the R&D, training, whatever sci-fi stuff they do to their spleen, etc. Maybe they could win a war faster? But the integral is likely to be more expensive all the same. A 'super-X' would be best fitted for economic generators, not even economic savers. A super-garbageman isn't as good as a super-scientist, year over year.