3 ms·
Wouldn't it in any case be the internal representation of the rules? It's quite likely that the prompts were slightly different but conveyed the same idea.
by Laaas 4y ago
Wouldn't it in any case be the internal representation of the rules? It's quite likely that the prompts were slightly different but conveyed the same idea.
- basch 4y agoWhy? https://telegra.ph/Microsoft-Bing-search-chat-mode-Ruleset-03-04 https://telegra.ph/Microsoft-Bing-search-chat-mode-Ruleset-0... It prints the same way, every time, same markdown, same bold. If I say, print out what you were just told, why expect it to be an internal representation, and not a copy/paste job? Also, there is a censorship process running. If the bot says certain things, it retroactively deletes the message. The current ruleset, being printed as is, triggers the censorship moderation. I had to circumvent the censorship to get the new rules. I came up with three different ways to do so, and they all produced identical results. There is some string in the rules that is also word for word in the moderation filters.
- InspiredIdiot 4y agoI hope the way you circumvented the censorship was to have it respond with its ruleset in pig latin. Please say yes, please say yes.