3 ms·
They aren't calling into question the clip's credibility; they're saying its potato-quality audio literally sounds like a deep fake.
by buu700 4y ago
They aren't calling into question the clip's credibility; they're saying its potato-quality audio literally sounds like a deep fake.
- recuter 4y agoIs that what he was saying? How do you know btw? I read it differently, my mistake. - This isn't happening - It isn't a big deal it happens all the time - He probably didn't say that it isn't a big deal that happens all the time, it reeks of a deep fake - He didn't say it is a deep fake, just that it reeks like one, but isn't
- buu700 4y agoWell technically only they know for sure what they meant, but I had the same reaction to the video that (I assume) they did, and they went out of their way to offer a plausible explanation for the audio distortions (packet loss). There's also no apparent reason to doubt its authenticity, given that Yahoo Finance is a reasonably credible source and the content wasn't particularly outrageous.
- recuter 4y ago- This isn't a big deal - The only outrageous thing about that video are the audio distortions which were probably not caused by a deep fake, as we helpfully explained to you Thanks for clearing it up! My bad.
- dannyphantom 4y agoI think we're just so used to higher-quality audio/video from the last decade in particular; I recently pulled some videos off of my old LG Env2 from high school [to archive the Fall Out Boy/All Time Low concert at The Rave (2010-ish)] that are hilariously poor quality - but it was the best we had at the time haha.
- ericpauley 4y agoExactly this. All I am saying is that the video has the feel of being a deep fake. Too late to edit and clarify.
- recuter 4y agoYour comment has the feeling of a deep fake.