Since I have an interest in Catholic apologetics I thought it would be interesting to see what apologetics for global warming look like. Without feigning any h

Since I have an interest in Catholic apologetics I thought it would be interesting to see what apologetics for global warming look like. Without feigning any hypothesis myself, it’s clear that climate apologetics is in an immature state. A lot of the answers come off as little more than “we’re the experts, trust us.” I suppose that’s due to the hypothesis’s defenders primary and virtually exclusive strategy being discrediting any dissenters rather than building strong arguments. Put in Aristotelian terms, the discourse on the climate is almost purely rhetorical and void of dialectic. Can you imagine a Catholic apologist attempting to defend the faith with “we’re the theology experts, trust us?”