This is a nice collection of facts and figures and reasoning. But why would a “climate skeptic” care about all that? If you have two camps fighting each other

This is a nice collection of facts and figures and reasoning. But why would a “climate skeptic” care about all that? If you have two camps fighting each other facts are only useful when the own worldview is supported. Everything else is discarded as propaganda, false facts or conspiracy. What I would like to have seen is how to really convince skeptics: By instilling doubt. It’s much more subtle. It’s also much less fact driven. I haven’t found a good source on that.