2 ms·

I’m a photographer and what’s funny is, the amount of work he put into producing these images is almost harder than just taking the damn photos or dare I say dr

I’m a photographer and what’s funny is, the amount of work he put into producing these images is almost harder than just taking the damn photos or dare I say drawing what you’d like to see an enhancing it with photoshop. It might be AI generated but there’s still a lot of human work gone into the images. The sad news for me personally is taking photos and working with models and lighting people etc is fun, same for meeting people and taking their portrait, this guy got images, the hard way and didn’t seem to get the experience. Maybe he enjoyed sifting through thousands of images and stitching them together, then editing with photo shop. I don’t know but it sounds much less interesting than photography but hey, to this guy it’s art, so good luck.

imiric 4y ago
Right, I don't see this as inferior to traditional photography, just different. Technology is just another tool we can use to produce art, or assist artists in doing so. Just as electronic music didn't replace instrumental music, or photography didn't replace paintings, we'll also find ways to incorporate AI as another tool that creates different forms of art. They will all have their audiences, and will broaden our senses in different ways. The current problem is that we can't distinguish AI-generated/assisted works from others, but eventually we'll find ways to do that too. > I’m a photographer Judging by your username, I'm not so sure... :-P Quick check: are you alive?