you obviously can't be against all growth else you would live as a hunter-gatherer. a more principled objection to the current situation is that you are agains

you obviously can't be against all growth else you would live as a hunter-gatherer. a more principled objection to the current situation is that you are against volatility. but to have this position you have to prove ethically/morally/economically that hiring 100 and firing 90 is worse than hiring 10, which is a very high bar to clear and not one i've ever seen a convincing argument for.