3 ms·
Low-effort FUD. This is an image of the author, who is a tenure track assistant professor in Denmark. Your comment is not constructive, is not based on any evid
by drabbiticus 4y ago
Low-effort FUD. This is an image of the author, who is a tenure track assistant professor in Denmark. Your comment is not constructive, is not based on any evidence, and can be addressed through simply clinking through 1 link in the OP.
- zzo38computer 4y ago> This is an image of the author It is confusing. They called the picture file "Lena" even though the author's name is not Lena.
- drabbiticus 4y agoSure, referential things are confusing to you if you don't know the reference. Nevertheless, HN has clear guidelines about comments. Of particular relevance is > Comments should get more thoughtful and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive. More generally, HN can be a great place when people take the time to consider their response and do a little digging. Discussions are more meaningful and fruitful if the the participates are minimally knowledgeable on the topic being discussed. This goes for any topic. Imagine if the reply to a machine learning post was asking "what if this picture-sorting AI became sentient and starting destroying the world? How can we know the scientists working on this can outsmart the AI? How can we be sure that they are being kind to our future overlords?"? They may feel that their view is completely valid, reasonable and informed because of the wealth of Sci-Fi literature that they have read, despite never having attempted to grapple with the actual material being submitted to HN.
- drabbiticus 4y agoshould add an edit: if the participants are (at least) minimally knowledgeable