2 ms·
COBOL (COmmon Business-Oriented Language) was designed by Grace Hopper to make it easier for business folks to write code. https://www.zdnet.com/article/cobol-
by drewcoo 4y ago
COBOL (COmmon Business-Oriented Language) was designed by Grace Hopper to make it easier for business folks to write code.
https://www.zdnet.com/article/cobol-grace-hoppers-gift-to-the-world-of-business/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/cobol-grace-hoppers-gift-to-th...
That goal a flop, so programmers had to take over.
Wasn't there a Cucumber/Gherkin story here really recently? That grew out of Fit/Fitnesse (from Ward Cunningham of "tech debt" and "the wiki" fame), which was intended to have business folks write test cases to define how the delivered software would work. And as many people in the Cuke threads pointed out, Cuke fails, too. (As did Fitnesse.)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FitNesse
Bottom line: There is a ridiculous impedance mismatch between the business side of the house and engineering. Engineering attempts to create a programming language for MBAs is not a solution, but an expression of that mismatch.
- kps 4y ago> COBOL was designed by Grace Hopper to make it easier for business folks to write code. Not quite; it (FLOW-MATIC, rather) was designed so that senior management could feel that they could read their organization's code. > I suggest a reply to those who would like data processing people to use mathematical symbols that they make the first attempt to teach those symbols to vice-presidents or a colonel or admiral. I assure you that I tried it.
- tragomaskhalos 4y agoThere is always money to be made by peddling the idea that you can bypass those pesky programmers and get Don from accounts to write his own applications instead. See also: most low-code / visual programming environments.