4 ms·

I understand what you're getting at, and I'm not even sure I have a question for you. Mercedes's system, ensuring that the cars does not disconnect for a minut

• jjoonathan 4y ago
  "I think one minute isn't safe enough. They should lockout for two minutes!" "I think two minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for three minutes!" "I think three minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for four minutes!" ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c This is a silly game without data. I'm open to the idea of escalating consequences to effect deterrence, but we need data, not "+1 forever" to figure out the correct threshold. In any case, that's a completely separate argument. My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case.
  • nolok 4y ago
    > My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case. I do disagree, I just don't know the solution, this not being my job nor my field. As for the first part of your message, if you cannot see a gigantic differences between a matter of minutes, and just a few seconds, when talking about emergencies and the need to figure out what's happening to react in one or two seconds, then this is not a productive conversation.
    • jjoonathan 4y ago
      You clearly don't know how the Tesla lockout works, can't be bothered to learn before making up your mind that it sucks, and can't even be bothered to learn after getting called out on it. No, this will not be a productive conversation. Goodbye.