3 ms·

Because it's not about MY expectations, it's about the expectations of the guy behind the wheel of the car crossing my path. Therefore I don't need it to be go

by nolok 4y ago

Because it's not about MY expectations, it's about the expectations of the guy behind the wheel of the car crossing my path. Therefore I don't need it to be good enough to convince ME, I need to go be good enough to convince HIM not to abuse it, and given the large variety of him out there the system needs to have a very high safety bar.

jjoonathan 4y ago
The guy behind the wheel gets beeped at if he stops paying attention and shut down if he keeps it up. Are you really arguing that this is insufficient to set the expectation that he should be paying attention? What, in your view, would be sufficient?
- nolok 4y ago
  I understand what you're getting at, and I'm not even sure I have a question for you. Mercedes's system, ensuring that the cars does not disconnect for a minute (instead of seconds) feels safer to me, for exemple.
  - jjoonathan 4y ago
    "I think one minute isn't safe enough. They should lockout for two minutes!" "I think two minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for three minutes!" "I think three minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for four minutes!" ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c This is a silly game without data. I'm open to the idea of escalating consequences to effect deterrence, but we need data, not "+1 forever" to figure out the correct threshold. In any case, that's a completely separate argument. My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case.
    - nolok 4y ago
      > My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case. I do disagree, I just don't know the solution, this not being my job nor my field. As for the first part of your message, if you cannot see a gigantic differences between a matter of minutes, and just a few seconds, when talking about emergencies and the need to figure out what's happening to react in one or two seconds, then this is not a productive conversation.
      - jjoonathan 4y ago
        You clearly don't know how the Tesla lockout works, can't be bothered to learn before making up your mind that it sucks, and can't even be bothered to learn after getting called out on it. No, this will not be a productive conversation. Goodbye.

by nolok 4y ago

jjoonathan 4y ago

The guy behind the wheel gets beeped at if he stops paying attention and shut down if he keeps it up. Are you really arguing that this is insufficient to set the expectation that he should be paying attention? What, in your view, would be sufficient?

nolok 4y ago
I understand what you're getting at, and I'm not even sure I have a question for you. Mercedes's system, ensuring that the cars does not disconnect for a minute (instead of seconds) feels safer to me, for exemple.
- jjoonathan 4y ago
  "I think one minute isn't safe enough. They should lockout for two minutes!" "I think two minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for three minutes!" "I think three minutes isn't safe enough. They should lockout for four minutes!" ... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJxwvZ5SE_c This is a silly game without data. I'm open to the idea of escalating consequences to effect deterrence, but we need data, not "+1 forever" to figure out the correct threshold. In any case, that's a completely separate argument. My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case.
  - nolok 4y ago
    > My claim is that the current system seems more than sufficient to reset any mistaken expectations due to marketing. You don't seem to disagree, so I rest my case. I do disagree, I just don't know the solution, this not being my job nor my field. As for the first part of your message, if you cannot see a gigantic differences between a matter of minutes, and just a few seconds, when talking about emergencies and the need to figure out what's happening to react in one or two seconds, then this is not a productive conversation.
    - jjoonathan 4y ago
      You clearly don't know how the Tesla lockout works, can't be bothered to learn before making up your mind that it sucks, and can't even be bothered to learn after getting called out on it. No, this will not be a productive conversation. Goodbye.