3 ms·
This is nitpicky. Fine. It does not require Apple to "build" something or to engage in additional work.
by jrm4 4y ago
This is nitpicky. Fine. It does not require Apple to "build" something or to engage in additional work.
- hellojesus 4y agoAgreed. It was nitpicky. But it still remains that the legislation removes a competitive advantage and possibly forces IP to be revealed.
- jrm4 4y agoYes. That would be the point. I don't think anyone would meaningfully argue AGAINST the idea that it is "detrimental to Apple and their interests," which is literally all this means.