3 ms·
Exactly; it means that you need to use strong words and attack in any argument to get user engagement. Everyone loves attention and wants to get their words he
by nicce 4y ago
Exactly; it means that you need to use strong words and attack in any argument to get user engagement.
Everyone loves attention and wants to get their words heard, and this will happen when you have only few words to use.
- Zetice 4y agoI see no problem with this; the goal of non-experts communicating is not to be the most accurate, nor should it be.
- nicce 4y agoThe problem is that political combats and campaings have been made on the same platform, and those might decide the future of the country and many people. E.g. Twitter is not for really for general people to provide content, it is mainly for those with large audience already. And they want attention.
- Zetice 4y ago“Provide content” you say this like there’s some objective measure for “good” and “bad” content, but there isn’t. I happen to enjoy political banter on Twitter.
- nicce 4y ago> “Provide content” you say this like there’s some objective measure for “good” and “bad” content, but there isn’t. There is. The algorithm decides what you see and not see. If someone has already larger follower list, it is likely that their posts will appear to others feeds whom are not following them, if the post causes strong interactions.
- Zetice 4y agoSo? That's not relevant to whether or not short content is somehow objectively "bad".