3 ms·
>More seriously, the original copyright owner (the photographer? playboy?) probably didn't license it for use as a visual benchmarking asset for graphics algori
by NovemberWhiskey 4y ago
>More seriously, the original copyright owner (the photographer? playboy?) probably didn't license it for use as a visual benchmarking asset for graphics algorithms.
The rights owner (Playboy, in this case) is on record saying they made a conscious choice not to enforce their rights to this image.
- danuker 4y agoIndeed, the first thing I did when I found the image as a teen was look for the rest of it. It acts like free advertising. Sadly it is against the model's wishes, so I'd feel bad. I will use the ethical replacement from now on.