My comment was more about the saying of the parents comment then specific to deno. What I mean is that a good craftsmen doesn't complain about bad tool because

My comment was more about the saying of the parents comment then specific to deno. What I mean is that a good craftsmen doesn't complain about bad tool because they choose to use good tools (or more precise appropriate tools for the job) not because they ad-hoc easily negate any drawbacks of bad tools(1). And if they use bad tools anyway they do so intentionally or because there is not other choice and in turn don't complain because it's pointless to do so. So the saying in the op comment is IMHO misleading at best deceptive at worst. Furthermore it doesn't advance any discussion, only side track it. I'm sure the deno specific workflow from the article is a grate tool for a lot of use-case. I'm also sure there are use cases where it will fall apart. (1): Depending on what you do creating a decent result without good tools might literally be impossible no matter how good your skill is. Or it might not make too much of a difference and can be compensated by skill, it's all context dependent, like most things in live.