4 ms·

Consent

• daneel_w 4y ago
  Whose consent? The model's, who never owned the rights to the photograph, or Playboy who does? Both parties gave consent to a million readers across the world to see the full picture.
  • CharlesW 4y ago
    This is not how photo licensing works. Photos don't magically become public domain because they've been published. There was never any license for it to be re-published and re-distributed in the context of test imagery.
    • throw009 4y ago
      So you're saying that we must ethically source images because it hurts playboys bottom line.
    • daneel_w 4y ago
      The "turmoil" around the use of this image was never about legality, licensing or royalties. By agreeing to the contract, and by publishing the picture, the publisher and the model gave their "social consent" for everyone to see it. In a fit of moralism the model had a change of mind about the picture; but likely not about her economic gain.
• bobleeswagger 4y ago
  What does consent have to do with a commercial photo shoot in a public magazine?