2 ms·
So there's contracts and there's intent and morality. The argument you have presented is analogous (like, right next door; they share a side-yard, their kids g
by shadowgovt 4y ago
So there's contracts and there's intent and morality.
The argument you have presented is analogous (like, right next door; they share a side-yard, their kids go to the same school, and they co-organize the neighborhood potluck) to the argument that you and I have no right to our data not being thrown in a big hopper to generate an AI that is designed to operate directly counter to our personal interests.
After all, if you didn't want thousands of websites hoovering up your information, transferring it to a central clearinghouse, and that clearinghouse building an AI to put you out of a job... You should never have logged onto those websites, right? Those TOS clearly said they could use your data for any purpose. The contract was quite clear (had we bothered to read it).
- sorenjan 4y agoSo your argument is that stock photography of humans are unethical unless every model signs a new model release for every use? Is it immoral to use András István Aratós image in memes too? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hide_the_Pain_Harold https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hide_the_Pain_Harold I have no issue with user data being used to build ML models, although I don't agree with you about the close proximity between a model's photo being used for photo research and anyone's data being used for everything.