4 ms·
First why not Lenard and Second, the picture (the short one) shows her hair and ceiling and not her breasts. And Third but minor complaint, if we look at the "
by nix23 4y ago
First why not Lenard and Second, the picture (the short one) shows her hair and ceiling and not her breasts.
And Third but minor complaint, if we look at the "Full" picture i at least "want" to see his butt.
- seventytwo 4y agoIt’s true. Imagery comparison is highly dependent on butts.
- CydeWeys 4y agoDude, it's literally porn. This is not hard.
- super256 4y agoErotica =/= Porn
- nix23 4y ago> Dude, it's literally porn. This is not hard. You are going to far, i don't think Lenard has anything todo with porn...well maybe the feather is a bit inappropriate for the normal US-Citizen but if you look at your Music-videos i don't think it's too much.
- throw009 4y agoWhat sort of hussy shows her shoulders?
- daneel_w 4y agoIt's not pornography. The full image is erotic in its nature. The cropped image aligns with pretty much any other non-nude glamour photography.
- CydeWeys 4y agoThis is from a shoot in literally the most well known and influential pornographic magazine of all time. Y'all don't even know what the word means if you don't think Playboy centerfold shoot qualifies.
- luckylion 4y agoAre you from a rural community in the US by any chance? I don't think I know anyone who would classify the Playboy as porn. There's a difference between erotic photography and pornography.
- nix23 4y agoWhen i was in the Swiss Military porn was a ~no-go, but we got Playboy for free..and the NZZ and some other papers.
- daneel_w 4y ago> "Y'all don't even know what the word means if you don't think Playboy centerfold shoot qualifies." Right back at you.